Employees already use AI
Leadership knows some tools are in use but has no complete inventory, approval path or shared information rules.
CyberTECT helps leadership identify current AI use, choose approved tools, define information boundaries and assign accountable human review before informal habits become business-wide exposure.
It often begins with individual accounts, free trials, browser extensions or new features appearing inside platforms the organization already uses.
Leadership knows some tools are in use but has no complete inventory, approval path or shared information rules.
The organization needs to understand permissions, information access, business use and human review before rollout.
Client, employee, financial or proprietary information creates consequences that generic AI guidance does not address.
The engagement is modular. CyberTECT builds only the controls the organization needs, then connects them into a usable approval and review process.
Public tools, paid accounts, embedded assistants, browser extensions, owners and approved business status.
The intended task, information involved, expected benefit, possible harm and required human decision.
Plain-language boundaries based on data type, tool approval and the organization’s actual confidentiality needs.
Account type, retention, training terms, integrations, data location, subcontractors, access and exit considerations.
Who reviews output, verifies sources, approves important uses and remains responsible for the final work.
Role-relevant awareness, questions and escalation when information is entered into the wrong tool or output causes concern.
Approved, restricted, prohibited and under-review tools with accountable owners.
Permitted work, information boundaries, review duties and reporting expectations.
Repeatable decision records for tools and proposed business uses.
Human accountability, exceptions, training and recurring reassessment.
The free AI & Information Check asks five questions about tools, sensitive information, vendors, approved storage and recurring oversight.
CyberTECT helps: translate management decisions into approved tools, practical rules, review records, staff guidance and ongoing oversight.
CyberTECT does not replace: legal advice, privacy counsel, intellectual-property advice, employment advice, model testing or formal certification.
The scope follows the tools and uses that matter to the organization. It does not require an enterprise AI program to establish sensible control.
No. The review is useful before adoption, during a pilot or after employees have already started using AI tools.
Not automatically. The objective is to define approved tools, permitted uses, restricted information and required human review based on the organization’s work and risk.
Yes. Policy and supporting registers can be developed as part of the engagement, but they must reflect actual tools, workflows and management decisions rather than a generic template.
No. CyberTECT addresses operational governance and control. Legal interpretation, professional obligations and formal privacy advice remain with qualified counsel or the appropriate authority.
Book a consultation to discuss current use, planned adoption and the governance pieces the organization actually needs.